Don't look so surprised, you knew it was coming.
Every single joke they made (and it was clear that the filmmakers found these characters to be the hilarious comedy relief of the film) fell flat on its face. True, these jokes weren’t aimed at a 24 year old man who is probably dead inside, but I had a hard time believing that even a kid would find the humor funny. Another disclaimer: I never watched the show as a kid. I have no idea if the characterization, production design, plot, and even editing are all a reference to the original show’s animation style and design. So there are my biases and flaws, completely exposed, as I feel like I can’t analyze the film honestly without those being on the table.
That being said, there were some interesting attempts in the
film to criticize not only our current society, but film making as well. The film’s plot revolves around Speed Racer
discovering the truth about the Grand Prix race: it’s been fixed for the last
50 years. At this point, the film
becomes overtly anti-capitalist, or at the very least, semi-Marxist, in that it
promoted the importance of equal opportunity and the corrupting evil of
capitalism and industry. It is not truly
Marxist, however, in that the film still promotes the value and importance of
self-interest, self-promotion, and individual accomplishments and talents,
things that Marxism does not value quite as highly. Indeed, the film rejects capitalist and Marxist principals and aligns itself more
with Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead and
some of the principals of Objectivism, which seek to raise up and reward those
who are truly exceptional, such as Speed Racer.
Howard Roarke (protagonist of The
Fountainhead), just like Speed Racer, is exceptional in his field of
Architecture, and his refusal to conform to the majority eventually puts him
ahead of the competition, just like Speed Racer’s refusal to accept bribes from
Mr. Royalton and his insistence on racing honestly.
So basically this, but with cars and rainbow-colored racetracks.
In another way, the poor CGI backgrounds and settings are a
way of telegraphing to its audience that the film is not realistic in any
way. The world presented on the screen
is not meant to be a realistic depiction of the real world, but an obviously
artificial one. Based on their previous
films, the Wachowski siblings have shown that they can make realistic looking
worlds using computer imagery, so the choice to make the world of Speed Racer look plastic, inauthentic,
and cartoony was probably an intentional one.
This may have simply been an homage to the original Japanese anime, or a
commentary on the artificiality of cinema. By intentionally creating a
cinematic world that is fake looking and unrealistic, the audience is not
sucked into the world that is on the screen, and by being removed from the
story, the audience can better focus on the parable and messages being
displayed without getting too immersed in the fiction.
Even though I hated the film, it was still an interesting
exercise to analyze a film I despise for deeper meaning and thought. Even bad movies have something of value that
can be gleamed from it. At the very
least, the film remains committed and consistent to some of its more
off-putting choices, such as the weird editing and cartoony, fake CGI
backgrounds, and these weird choices do give the film a unique look and feel.
So hats off to the Wachowskis for making an Objectivist fable that criticizes
our current society as well as the artificiality of Hollywood filmmaking, even
if their final effort made me want to vomit all the colors of the rainbow.
You know, to match the color palate of the film



No comments:
Post a Comment